Running Rereflect Fully Offline With a Local LLM
Why offline analysis matters
Customer feedback is some of the most sensitive text a company holds. It contains names, account details, candid frustrations, and sometimes data customers assumed was private. The default mode for most AI feedback tools is to ship that text to a third-party API for processing — which means your customers' words leave your control the moment they are analyzed.
For a lot of teams, that is a non-starter. Maybe you operate under a data residency requirement. Maybe your security team will not approve sending customer data to an external model provider. Maybe you simply do not want a copy of every support complaint sitting in someone else's logs.
Rereflect is self-hosted and open source, and it is built so that you never have to make that trade-off. You can run the entire analysis pipeline against a model on your own hardware. Nothing about a piece of feedback — the raw text, the inferred sentiment, the extracted pain points — ever crosses your network boundary.
BYOK, including bringing your own model
Rereflect follows a bring-your-own-key (BYOK) philosophy. There is no Rereflect-managed AI service in the middle, no per-seat AI markup, and no usage metering on our side. You connect Rereflect to whatever model you want to use, and you pay that provider directly (or, in the local case, pay nobody).
BYOK usually means pasting in an OpenAI or Anthropic key. But the same mechanism that lets you point Rereflect at a hosted provider also lets you point it at a model running on localhost. From Rereflect's perspective, a local model exposed over an OpenAI-compatible HTTP endpoint looks exactly like a remote one — it just happens to live on your own machine.
That gives you three deployment shapes, all using the same configuration surface:
- Hosted API with your own key — point Rereflect at OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google using a key you own. Best accuracy, you pay the provider per token.
- Local LLM, no key — run a model with Ollama or any OpenAI-compatible server on your infra. Keyless, private, $0 in API costs.
- No model at all — skip LLM configuration entirely and fall back to the built-in VADER analyzer, which runs locally with zero dependencies.
Pointing Rereflect at a local model
The most common offline setup uses Ollama, which runs open-weight models locally and exposes an OpenAI-compatible API. Once Ollama is running and you have pulled a model, you configure Rereflect to talk to it through the same base-URL and model-name settings you would use for any OpenAI-compatible provider.
The shape of the configuration is simple: tell Rereflect the base URL of your local endpoint and the model name to request. Because the endpoint is OpenAI-compatible, no API key is required — you can leave the key blank or set a throwaway placeholder, since the local server does not authenticate.
- Run a local server — start Ollama (or another OpenAI-compatible runtime such as llama.cpp's server, LM Studio, or vLLM) and load a model that suits your hardware.
- Set the base URL — point Rereflect's LLM base URL at your local endpoint (for Ollama, that is its local OpenAI-compatible address).
- Set the model name — specify the model you pulled, so requests ask for the right weights.
- Leave the key empty — local endpoints do not require authentication, so no API key is needed.
After that, the analysis pipeline behaves identically to a hosted setup. Feedback gets sentiment scores, pain point categories, feature request extraction, and urgency flags — all computed by the model on your own machine. The only difference is that no request ever leaves your network.
Smaller local models will not match a frontier hosted model on the hardest, most ambiguous feedback. But for the bulk of routine categorization and sentiment work, a capable local model is more than good enough — and the privacy and cost properties are unbeatable.
The free VADER fallback
Not every team wants to run a model at all. Maybe you do not have a GPU handy, or you just want to see Rereflect working on your data before you commit to any AI setup. For that, Rereflect ships with a built-in fallback: VADER.
VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner) is a lexicon and rule-based sentiment analyzer. It runs entirely in-process with no model weights, no GPU, and no network calls. When no LLM is configured, Rereflect automatically uses VADER for sentiment analysis so the product still works out of the box.
It is important to be honest about what the fallback does and does not give you. VADER is a sentiment engine, not a general-purpose language model:
- What you get — fast, fully local sentiment scoring (positive / neutral / negative) on every piece of feedback, with zero configuration.
- What is reduced — the richer LLM-driven steps (nuanced pain point detection, feature request extraction, urgency reasoning) are stronger with an actual language model behind them.
- When it is enough — early-stage teams, smaller volumes, or anyone who wants an immediate, dependency-free sense of sentiment trends before wiring up a model.
The practical path most self-hosters take: start with the VADER fallback to confirm Rereflect is ingesting and scoring your feedback, then point it at a local LLM once you want the deeper categorization. Both modes keep your data on your own infrastructure.
What this costs: nothing
The offline setup has a genuinely simple cost story. There is no Rereflect subscription — the software is open source and self-hosted. There is no AI bill — a local model runs on hardware you already own, and the VADER fallback has no marginal cost at all. There is no per-seat pricing and no usage metering.
Your only real cost is the compute you choose to provision. If you run a local model on an existing server or a developer workstation, the incremental cost of analyzing feedback is effectively electricity. If you decide later that you want higher accuracy on hard cases, you can switch a single configuration value to a hosted provider with your own key — and you pay that provider directly, with no markup in between.
This is the core promise of the self-hosted, BYOK model: you own the data, you own the infrastructure, and you decide exactly how much (if anything) to spend on intelligence.
Getting started
If privacy or cost has kept you away from AI-powered feedback analysis, the offline path removes both objections. You can stand up Rereflect, point it at a local model — or just let the VADER fallback handle sentiment — and start seeing categorized, scored feedback without a single byte leaving your network.
Rereflect is open source under the MIT license. Clone it, run it on your own infrastructure, and configure the analyzer to match your privacy and budget requirements. Whether that means a local Ollama model, your own OpenAI key, or no model at all, the choice stays entirely yours.
Ready to organize your feedback?
Rereflect is free, open-source, and self-hosted. Automatically analyze customer feedback with AI-powered sentiment analysis, pain point detection, and urgency flagging — on your own infrastructure.
Continue reading
Tailoring the AI to Your Product: Custom Categories and Health Weights
Generic feedback categories rarely match how your team actually thinks about your product. Rereflect lets you define your own pain-point, feature-request, and urgency taxonomies and feed them directly into the analyzer — and tune the weights behind your customer health score so it reflects what churn actually looks like for you.
How to Organize Customer Feedback (2026 Guide)
Customer feedback is one of the most valuable assets a SaaS company has. But without a clear system to organize it, insights get lost in spreadsheets, Slack threads, and email chains. Here is a practical guide to building a feedback system that scales.
Customer Feedback Analysis: Manual vs AI-Powered
Should your team analyze customer feedback manually or use AI? This comparison breaks down the real trade-offs in accuracy, speed, cost, and scalability to help you decide when to make the switch.
Sentiment Analysis for SaaS: A Beginner's Guide
Sentiment analysis turns raw customer feedback into measurable signals. This guide explains how it works, why SaaS teams need it, and how to start using it without a data science degree.
Rereflect vs Productboard: Which Is Right for Your Team?
Productboard is a powerful product management platform. Rereflect is an AI-powered feedback analysis tool. They solve related but different problems. This comparison helps you decide which fits your team.
How to Prioritize Features Using Customer Feedback
Feature requests pile up fast. Without a system to prioritize them using actual customer data, product teams end up building for the loudest voice instead of the biggest impact. Here is a practical framework.
Rereflect vs Canny: Feedback Collection vs Feedback Intelligence
Canny is a popular feedback board for collecting and voting on feature requests. Rereflect uses AI to analyze feedback from all your channels. This comparison helps you understand which approach your team needs.
5 Signs Your Customers Are About to Churn (Hidden in Their Feedback)
Most SaaS companies only notice churn when a customer cancels. But the warning signs were in their feedback weeks or months earlier. Here are the five hidden signals you should be watching for.
Rereflect vs UserVoice: Modern AI Analysis vs Traditional Feedback Boards
UserVoice pioneered online feedback boards. Rereflect uses AI to analyze feedback from every channel automatically. This comparison helps you decide between a traditional voting model and modern AI-powered analysis.
How Support Teams Can Turn Ticket Data Into Product Insights
Your support tickets contain a goldmine of product intelligence. Most teams resolve tickets and move on. Here is how to systematically extract product insights from the conversations your support team has every day.
Rereflect vs MonkeyLearn: Purpose-Built Feedback AI vs Generic Text Analysis
MonkeyLearn is a general-purpose text analysis platform. Rereflect is built specifically for customer feedback. This comparison explains why purpose-built tools often outperform generic ones for feedback analysis.
The Data-Driven Product Roadmap: Stop Building What the Loudest Customer Wants
The loudest customer gets the feature. The biggest deal gets the priority. Sound familiar? Here is how to build a product roadmap driven by actual customer data instead of whoever has the most influence in the room.
Rereflect vs Thematic: Real-Time Feedback Analysis for Growing SaaS Teams
Thematic specializes in customer feedback analytics for large enterprises. Rereflect brings AI-powered analysis to growing SaaS teams. This comparison breaks down where each tool excels.
NPS Is Not Enough: Why Qualitative Feedback Analysis Matters More
Net Promoter Score tells you a number. It does not tell you why. For SaaS teams that want to improve their product, qualitative feedback analysis provides the depth that NPS cannot.
Rereflect vs Idiomatic: AI Feedback Analysis Compared
Both Rereflect and Idiomatic use AI to analyze customer feedback. But their approaches differ significantly in scope, pricing, and target audience. Here is an honest comparison.
How to Build a Voice-of-Customer Program Without a Dedicated Team
You do not need a dedicated VoC team to understand your customers. Here is a practical guide for small SaaS teams to build an effective voice-of-customer program with limited resources.
How to Close the Customer Feedback Loop (And Why Most Teams Never Do)
Collecting feedback is the easy part. Closing the loop — actually telling customers what happened to what they said — is where most teams fall short. This guide covers the mechanics of a real feedback loop, why it matters for retention, and how to build the habit without drowning your team.
How to Triage Customer Feedback Fast Without Losing Signal
When feedback volume outpaces your team's ability to read it, triage is the skill that matters most. This guide covers the principles and practical steps for getting the right feedback in front of the right person quickly — without letting anything important fall through the cracks.
Feedback Tagging and Taxonomy: A Practical Guide to Labeling That Lasts
A tagging system that starts clean tends to collapse into chaos within a few months. This guide explains why, and how to design a feedback taxonomy that stays useful as volume and team size grow — covering tag design principles, common failure modes, and governance practices that prevent tag sprawl.
Why Centralizing Customer Feedback Is Harder Than It Looks
Customer feedback arrives through support tickets, app store reviews, NPS surveys, sales calls, and a dozen other channels. Centralizing it sounds simple. In practice, most teams end up with several "single sources of truth" that each hold a different slice of the picture. Here is why that happens and how to actually fix it.
A Library of Customer Feedback Response Templates (And When to Use Each)
Response templates save time without sounding robotic — if they are written well and used in the right situations. This post gives you a practical library of templates for the most common feedback scenarios, along with guidance on when to personalize, when to escalate, and when a template is the wrong tool entirely.
Reducing Feedback Response Time Without Burning Out Your Support Team
Faster responses to customer feedback correlate with better outcomes — but "respond faster" is bad advice without a system behind it. This guide covers the structural changes that actually reduce response time: prioritization, queuing, templating, and knowing when speed matters and when it does not.
Building a Feedback Workflow With Status Tracking That Your Whole Team Can Use
Feedback without a workflow is a collection of observations. A workflow with status tracking turns those observations into decisions, handoffs, and actions. This guide covers the states a feedback item moves through, who is responsible at each stage, and how to design a system your team will actually maintain.